↓ Skip to main content

Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 512)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12178-013-9167-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin-Ting Chen, Adam S. Tenforde, Michael Fredericson

Abstract

Stress fractures are a common type of overuse injury in athletes. Females have unique risk factors such as the female athlete triad that contribute to stress fracture injuries. We review the current literature on risk factors for stress fractures, including the role of sports participation and nutrition factors. Discussion of the management of stress fractures is focused on radiographic criteria and anatomic location and how these contribute to return to play guidelines. We outline the current recommendations for evaluating and treatment of female athlete triad. Technologies that may aid in recovery from a stress fracture including use of anti-gravity treadmills are discussed. Prevention strategies may include early screening of female athlete triad, promoting early participation in activities that improve bone health, nutritional strategies, gait modification, and orthotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 240 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 20%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 19 8%
Other 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 61 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 24%
Sports and Recreations 47 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 68 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#473,334
of 24,071,024 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#5
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,174
of 200,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,071,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them