↓ Skip to main content

Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007798.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Webster, Joan, Osborne, Sonya, Rickard, Claire M, New, Karen

Abstract

US Centers for Disease Control guidelines recommend replacement of peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters no more frequently than every 72 to 96 hours. Routine replacement is thought to reduce the risk of phlebitis and bloodstream infection. Catheter insertion is an unpleasant experience for patients and replacement may be unnecessary if the catheter remains functional and there are no signs of inflammation. Costs associated with routine replacement may be considerable. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 89 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 13 14%
Other 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 20%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 14 15%