↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
141 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
6 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0788-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jozo Grgic, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Mislav Skrepnik, Timothy B. Davies, Pavle Mikulic

Abstract

Rest interval (RI) duration is an important resistance-training variable underlying gain in muscular strength. Recommendations for optimal RI duration for gains in muscular strength are largely inferred from studies examining the acute resistance training effects, and the generalizability of such findings to chronic adaptations is uncertain. The goals of this systematic literature review are: (i) to aggregate findings and interpret the studies that assessed chronic muscular strength adaptations to resistance training interventions involving different RI durations, and (ii) to provide evidence-based recommendations for exercise practitioners and athletes. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines with a literature search encompassing five databases. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. Twenty-three studies comprising a total of 491 participants (413 males and 78 females) were found to meet the inclusion criteria. All studies were classified as being of good to moderate methodological quality; none of the studies were of poor methodological quality. The current literature shows that robust gains in muscular strength can be achieved even with short RIs (< 60 s). However, it seems that longer duration RIs (> 2 min) are required to maximize strength gains in resistance-trained individuals. With regard to untrained individuals, it seems that short to moderate RIs (60-120 s) are sufficient for maximizing muscular strength gains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 385 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 19%
Student > Bachelor 72 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Other 25 6%
Researcher 23 6%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 106 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 169 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 117 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#468,296
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#448
of 2,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,712
of 326,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.