↓ Skip to main content

Magnitude of Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load Resistance Training Versus Low-Load Resistance Training Associated with Blood-Flow Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis…

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
91 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
291 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
804 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnitude of Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load Resistance Training Versus Low-Load Resistance Training Associated with Blood-Flow Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoel E. Lixandrão, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Ricardo Berton, Felipe C. Vechin, Miguel S. Conceição, Felipe Damas, Cleiton A. Libardi, Hamilton Roschel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 804 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 804 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 130 16%
Student > Bachelor 126 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Researcher 40 5%
Other 107 13%
Unknown 301 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 207 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 95 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 2%
Other 49 6%
Unknown 323 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#403,329
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#391
of 2,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,445
of 336,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.