↓ Skip to main content

Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12916-018-1087-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina M. Long, Fiona McDermott, Graham N. Meadows

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 348 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 18%
Student > Master 54 16%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 21 6%
Other 62 18%
Unknown 88 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 67 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 18%
Social Sciences 30 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 6%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 106 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,778,052
of 26,603,725 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,249
of 4,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,045
of 345,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#27
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,603,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.