↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1219-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Myburgh, Alisa Higgins, Alina Jovanovska, Jeffrey Lipman, Naresh Ramakrishnan, John Santamaria, the CAT Study investigators

Abstract

To determine whether there was a difference between epinephrine and norepinephrine in achieving a mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal in intensive care (ICU) patients.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 364 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 68 18%
Researcher 52 13%
Student > Postgraduate 52 13%
Student > Master 32 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 6%
Other 89 23%
Unknown 73 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 253 65%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 76 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#881,928
of 26,391,249 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#816
of 5,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,750
of 97,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,249 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.