The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Practical application of visible-induced luminescence and use of parasitic IR reflectance as relative spatial reference in Egyptian artifacts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00848-x |
Authors |
Paolo A. M. Triolo, Martina Spingardi, Giorgio A. Costa, Federico Locardi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 4 | 33% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 17% |
Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,572,330
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#705
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,069
of 349,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.