↓ Skip to main content

Mouse Oocyte Development

Overview of attention for book
Mouse Oocyte Development
Springer New York
Attention for Chapter 7: Transcriptome Profiling of Single Mouse Oocytes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Transcriptome Profiling of Single Mouse Oocytes
Chapter number 7
Book title
Mouse Oocyte Development
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8603-3_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8602-6, 978-1-4939-8603-3
Authors

Maud Borensztein, Laurène Syx, Nicolas Servant, Edith Heard, Borensztein, Maud, Syx, Laurène, Servant, Nicolas, Heard, Edith

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) enables the detection and quantification of mature RNAs in an individual cell. Assessing single cell transcriptomes can circumvent the limited amount of starting material obtained in oocytes or embryos, in particular when working with mutant mice. Here we outline our scRNAseq protocol to study mouse oocyte transcriptomes, derived from Tang et al., Nat Methods 6(5):377-382, 2009 . The method describes the different steps from single cell isolation and cDNA amplification to high-throughput sequencing. The bioinformatics pipeline used to analyze and compare genome-wide gene expression between individual oocytes is then described.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2026.
All research outputs
#5,074,702
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,473
of 18,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,862
of 497,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#88
of 1,554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.