You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
インクルーシブデザインワークショップにおける共感的理解を促すアイスブレイク手法の提案
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japan Journal of Educational Technology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.15077/jjet.kj00009957524 |
| Authors |
安斎 勇樹, 塩瀬 隆之, 山田 小百合, 水町 衣里 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 67% |
| Austria | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,336,874
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#80
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,855
of 321,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.