Cyber-Physical Security for Critical Infrastructures Protection
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cyber-Physical Security for Critical Infrastructures Protection
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-69781-5 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-03-069780-8, 978-3-03-069781-5
|
| Editors |
Habtamu Abie, Silvio Ranise, Luca Verderame, Enrico Cambiaso, Rita Ugarelli, Gabriele Giunta, Isabel Praça, Federica Battisti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,540,149
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,693
of 8,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,064
of 503,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.