↓ Skip to main content

Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach
Published in
PLoS Biology, February 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey L. Weissgerber

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,407,284
of 26,420,475 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#3,463
of 10,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,491
of 456,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#53
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,420,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.