↓ Skip to main content

Three‐dimensional electrical resistivity model of the hydrothermal system in Long Valley Caldera, California, from magnetotellurics

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three‐dimensional electrical resistivity model of the hydrothermal system in Long Valley Caldera, California, from magnetotellurics
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016gl069263
Authors

J. R. Peacock, M. T. Mangan, D. McPhee, P. E. Wannamaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 68%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,591,104
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#9,437
of 20,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,633
of 371,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#158
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.