The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Intravitreous Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Ophthalmology, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0606 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raj K. Maturi, Adam R. Glassman, Kristin Josic, Andrew N. Antoszyk, Barbara A. Blodi, Lee M. Jampol, Dennis M. Marcus, Daniel F. Martin, Michele Melia, Hani Salehi-Had, Cynthia R. Stockdale, Omar S. Punjabi, Jennifer K. Sun |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 29% |
Spain | 3 | 11% |
Uruguay | 1 | 4% |
Peru | 1 | 4% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 48 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 52 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 303. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#114,075
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#79
of 6,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,436
of 445,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.