↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life and long-term outcomes after hospitalization for COVID-19: Protocol for a prospective cohort study (Coalition VII)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of life and long-term outcomes after hospitalization for COVID-19: Protocol for a prospective cohort study (Coalition VII)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2021
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20210003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regis Goulart Rosa, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Luciano César Pontes de Azevedo, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Otavio Berwanger, Álvaro Avezum, Renato Delascio Lopes, Thiago Costa Lisboa, Cassiano Teixeira, Fernando Godinho Zampieri, Bruno Martins Tomazini, Letícia Kawano-Dourado, Daniel Schneider, Denise de Souza, Rosa da Rosa Minho dos Santos, Sabrina Souza da Silva, Geraldine Trott, Bruna dos Passos Gimenes, Ana Paula de Souza, Bruna Machado Barroso, Lauren Sezerá Costa, Liége Gregoletto Brognoli, Melissa Pezzetti Pelliccioli, Nicole dos Santos Studier, Raíne Fogliati de Carli Schardosim, Tainá Aparecida Haubert, Victoria Emanuele Lobo Pallaoro, Debora Mariani de Oliveira, Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Gregory Saraiva Medeiros, Marcelo Basso Gazzana, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki, Paulo Márcio Pitrez, Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Luiz Antônio Nasi, Luciano Serpa Hammes, Maicon Falavigna

Abstract

The long-term effects caused by COVID-19 are unknown. The present study aims to assess factors associated with health-related quality of life and long-term outcomes among survivors of hospitalization for COVID-19 in Brazil. This is a multicenter prospective cohort study nested in five randomized clinical trials designed to assess the effects of specific COVID-19 treatments in over 50 centers in Brazil. Adult survivors of hospitalization due to proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection will be followed-up for a period of 1 year by means of structured telephone interviews. The primary outcome is the 1-year utility score of health-related quality of life assessed by the EuroQol-5D3L. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, rehospitalizations, return to work or study, physical functional status assessed by the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, dyspnea assessed by the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, need for long-term ventilatory support, symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, and self-rated health assessed by the EuroQol-5D3L Visual Analog Scale. Generalized estimated equations will be performed to test the association between five sets of variables (1- demographic characteristics, 2- premorbid state of health, 3- characteristics of acute illness, 4- specific COVID-19 treatments received, and 5- time-updated postdischarge variables) and outcomes. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of all participant institutions. The results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 21%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 45 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 52 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#150
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,287
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.