The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013621.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chunhu Shi, Jo C Dumville, Nicky Cullum, Sarah Rhodes, Elizabeth McInnes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 45% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
Researcher | 11 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 11% |
Unknown | 107 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Unknown | 109 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,120,768
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,293
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,193
of 459,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.