↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 MW7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 MW7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8
Authors

Susan E. Hough, Stacey S. Martin, Vineet Gahalaut, Anand Joshi, M. Landes, R. Bossu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 36%
Engineering 7 18%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,932,172
of 15,387,000 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#436
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,961
of 266,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,387,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.