↓ Skip to main content

Política de saneamento básico no Brasil: discussão de uma trajetória

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Política de saneamento básico no Brasil: discussão de uma trajetória
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, September 2016
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702016000300002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Cristina A. de Sousa, Nilson do Rosário Costa

Abstract

This article demonstrates that the position of dominance enjoyed by state sanitation companies dictates the public policy decision-making process for sanitation in Brazil. These companies' hegemony is explained here through the analysis of a path that generated political and economic incentives that have permitted its consolidation over time. Through the content analysis of the legislation proposed for the sector and the material produced by the stakeholders involved in the approval of new regulations for the sector in 2007, the study identifies the main sources of incentive introduced by the adoption of the National Sanitation Plan, which explain certain structural features of the current sanitation policy and its strong capacity to withstand the innovations proposed under democratic rule.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 19%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,512,657
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#559
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,825
of 349,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.