↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and Outcomes of Over 300,000 Patients with COVID-19 and History of Cancer in the United States and Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics and Outcomes of Over 300,000 Patients with COVID-19 and History of Cancer in the United States and Spain
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2021
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Roel, Andrea Pistillo, Martina Recalde, Anthony G. Sena, Sergio Fernández-Bertolín, Maria Aragón, Diana Puente, Waheed-Ul-Rahman Ahmed, Heba Alghoul, Osaid Alser, Thamir M. Alshammari, Carlos Areia, Clair Blacketer, William Carter, Paula Casajust, Aedin C. Culhane, Dalia Dawoud, Frank DeFalco, Scott L. DuVall, Thomas Falconer, Asieh Golozar, Mengchun Gong, Laura Hester, George Hripcsak, Eng Hooi Tan, Hokyun Jeon, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Lana Y.H. Lai, Kristine E. Lynch, Michael E. Matheny, Daniel R. Morales, Karthik Natarajan, Fredrik Nyberg, Anna Ostropolets, José D. Posada, Albert Prats-Uribe, Christian G. Reich, Donna R. Rivera, Lisa M. Schilling, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Karishma Shah, Nigam H. Shah, Yang Shen, Matthew Spotniz, Vignesh Subbian, Marc A. Suchard, Annalisa Trama, Lin Zhang, Ying Zhang, Patrick B. Ryan, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Kristin Kostka, Talita Duarte-Salles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Unspecified 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 16 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,071,155
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#376
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,393
of 433,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#7
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.