↓ Skip to main content

Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
98 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, July 2021
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julián Aliste, Sebastián Layera, Daniela Bravo, Álvaro Jara, Gonzalo Muñoz, Cristián Barrientos, Rodrigo Wulf, Julián Brañez, Roderick J Finlayson, De Q Tran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 55 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 55 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#682,115
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#54
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,129
of 449,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.