The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Double‐tagging scores of seabirds reveals that light‐level geolocator accuracy is limited by species idiosyncrasies and equatorial solar profiles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.13698 |
Authors |
Luke R. Halpin, Jeremy D. Ross, Raül Ramos, Rowan Mott, Nicholas Carlile, Nick Golding, José Manuel Reyes‐González, Teresa Militão, Fernanda De Felipe, Zuzana Zajková, Marta Cruz‐Flores, Sarah Saldanha, Virginia Morera‐Pujol, Leia Navarro‐Herrero, Laura Zango, Jacob González‐Solís, Rohan H. Clarke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 24% |
United States | 4 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 52% |
Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 20% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,572,402
of 26,745,229 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,159
of 2,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,694
of 440,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#33
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,745,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.