↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Double‐tagging scores of seabirds reveals that light‐level geolocator accuracy is limited by species idiosyncrasies and equatorial solar profiles

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Double‐tagging scores of seabirds reveals that light‐level geolocator accuracy is limited by species idiosyncrasies and equatorial solar profiles
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, August 2021
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.13698
Authors

Luke R. Halpin, Jeremy D. Ross, Raül Ramos, Rowan Mott, Nicholas Carlile, Nick Golding, José Manuel Reyes‐González, Teresa Militão, Fernanda De Felipe, Zuzana Zajková, Marta Cruz‐Flores, Sarah Saldanha, Virginia Morera‐Pujol, Leia Navarro‐Herrero, Laura Zango, Jacob González‐Solís, Rohan H. Clarke

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 43%
Environmental Science 6 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Mathematics 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,364,436
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#670
of 2,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,742
of 425,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#28
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.