↓ Skip to main content

Failure analysis of hydraulic turbine shaft

Overview of attention for article published in Engineering Failure Analysis, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure analysis of hydraulic turbine shaft
Published in
Engineering Failure Analysis, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.10.006
Authors

Dejan Momčilović, Zoran Odanović, Radivoje Mitrović, Ivana Atanasovska, Tomaž Vuherer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 37 64%
Unspecified 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Engineering Failure Analysis
#65
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,230
of 157,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them