↓ Skip to main content

「青い芝の会」における知的障害者観の変容 : もう1つの転換点として

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Social Welfare, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 106)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「青い芝の会」における知的障害者観の変容 : もう1つの転換点として
Published in
Japanese Journal of Social Welfare, July 2018
DOI 10.24469/jssw.50.3_18
Authors

廣野 俊輔

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Social Welfare
#20
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,355
of 343,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Social Welfare
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.