↓ Skip to main content

Clinical use of tranexamic acid: evidences and controversies

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 101)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical use of tranexamic acid: evidences and controversies
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.08.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria J. Colomina, Laura Contreras, Patricia Guilabert, Maylin Koo, Esther M..ndez, Antoni Sabate

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 61 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 60 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,153,676
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#5
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,689
of 444,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them