↓ Skip to main content

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 65,778)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmj.n2635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul D Thacker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77,440 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 13%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 63 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 71 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43484. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2
of 26,310,456 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1
of 65,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 449,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 881 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,310,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 881 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.