↓ Skip to main content

Consumption with Large Sip Sizes Increases Food Intake and Leads to Underestimation of the Amount Consumed

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumption with Large Sip Sizes Increases Food Intake and Leads to Underestimation of the Amount Consumed
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dieuwerke P. Bolhuis, Catriona M. M. Lakemond, Rene A. de Wijk, Pieternel A. Luning, Cees de Graaf

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that bite and sip sizes influence the amount of food intake. Consuming with small sips instead of large sips means relatively more sips for the same amount of food to be consumed; people may believe that intake is higher which leads to faster satiation. This effect may be disturbed when people are distracted.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#401,909
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,605
of 231,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,763
of 293,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#115
of 5,026 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,026 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.