↓ Skip to main content

A Population-Based Analysis of Diabetes-Related Care Measures, Foot Complications, and Amputation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Population-Based Analysis of Diabetes-Related Care Measures, Foot Complications, and Amputation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada
Published in
JAMA Network Open, January 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles de Mestral, David Gomez, Andrew S. Wilton, Douglas S. Lee, Zaina Albalawi, Peter C. Austin, Jean Jacob-Brassard, David R. Urbach, Mohammed Al-Omran, Nancy N. Baxter

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 29 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 29 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,267,593
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#5,383
of 10,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,106
of 532,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#275
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 127.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.