You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Population-Based Analysis of Diabetes-Related Care Measures, Foot Complications, and Amputation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42354 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles de Mestral, David Gomez, Andrew S. Wilton, Douglas S. Lee, Zaina Albalawi, Peter C. Austin, Jean Jacob-Brassard, David R. Urbach, Mohammed Al-Omran, Nancy N. Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,161,320
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#4,668
of 9,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,474
of 518,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#272
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.