The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
N. Venkatesh Prajna, Tiruvengada Krishnan, Jeena Mascarenhas, Revathi Rajaraman, Lalitha Prajna, Muthiah Srinivasan, Anita Raghavan, Catherine E. Oldenburg, Kathryn J. Ray, Michael E. Zegans, Stephen D. McLeod, Travis C. Porco, Nisha R. Acharya, Thomas M. Lietman, for the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 10% |
Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
Other | 45 | 22% |
Unknown | 66 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 43% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Unknown | 72 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,256,551
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1,883
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,787
of 201,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#16
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.