The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consequences of changes in vegetation and snow cover for climate feedbacks in Alaska and northwest Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/105003 |
| Authors |
E S Euskirchen, A P Bennett, A L Breen, H Genet, M A Lindgren, T A Kurkowski, A D McGuire, T S Rupp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 38 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,666,927
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#4,145
of 6,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,983
of 332,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#76
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.