↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Nutrition and Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Advances in Nutrition and Cancer'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Role of Metabolic Carcinogenesis in Cancer Causation and Prevention: Evidence from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Obesity, Energy Balance, and Cancer: A Mechanistic Perspective.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Fruits and Vegetables: Updating the Epidemiologic Evidence for the WCRF/AICR Lifestyle Recommendations for Cancer Prevention.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The diet as a cause of human prostate cancer.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Mediterranean Dietary Pattern and Chronic Diseases.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Dietary Salt Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Alcoholic Beverages and Carbonated Soft Drinks: Consumption and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risks.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Drugs from Nature.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Selenium and Cancer: A Story that Should not be Forgotten-Insights from Genomics
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Resveratrol: From Basic Studies to Bedside.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Quercetin: A Pleiotropic Kinase Inhibitor Against Cancer.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Sulforaphane as a Promising Molecule for Fighting Cancer
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Functions, Aberrations, and Advances for Chromatin Modulation in Cancer.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Epigenetics and Epidemiology: Models of Study and Examples.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Dietary Epigenetics in Cancer and Aging
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Breast Cancer and the Importance of Early Life Nutrition
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Olive Oil and Other Dietary Lipids in Breast Cancer.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Holistic Approach to Study the Effects of Natural Antioxidants on Inflammation and Liver Cancer.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Extra Virgin Olive Oil: From Composition to "Molecular Gastronomy"
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Life Style Prevention of Cancer Recurrence: The Yin and the Yang.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 New Perspective for an Old Antidiabetic Drug: Metformin as Anticancer Agent.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Gut Microbes, Diet, and Cancer.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Advances in Nutrition and Cancer
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Nutriomes and Personalised Nutrition for DNA Damage Prevention, Telomere Integrity Maintenance and Cancer Growth Control
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Novel Approaches in Melanoma Prevention and Therapy.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Concluding Remarks.
Attention for Chapter 9: Selenium and Cancer: A Story that Should not be Forgotten-Insights from Genomics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 194)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Selenium and Cancer: A Story that Should not be Forgotten-Insights from Genomics
Chapter number 9
Book title
Advances in Nutrition and Cancer
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38007-5_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-238006-8, 978-3-64-238007-5
Authors

Catherine Méplan, John Hesketh, Méplan C, Hesketh J, Méplan, Catherine, Hesketh, John

Editors

Vincenzo Zappia, Salvatore Panico, Gian Luigi Russo, Alfredo Budillon, Fulvio Della Ragione

Abstract

Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient that is incorporated into selenoproteins. Although epidemiological studies suggest that low Se intake is associated with increased risk of various cancers, the results of supplementation trials have been confusing. These conflicting results may be due to different baseline Se status and/or genetic factors. In addition, mechanistic links between Se intake, selenoproteins and carcinogenesis are not clear. In this article, we discuss the functional significance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in selenoprotein genes and the evidence as to whether or not they influence risk of colorectal, prostate, lung or breast cancers. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that a small number of SNPs in genes encoding glutathione peroxidases 1 and 4, selenoprotein P, selenoprotein S and 15-kDa selenoprotein have functional consequences. Data from case-control studies suggest that a variant at codon 198 in glutathione peroxidase 1 influences the effect of Se status on prostate cancer and risk, and it has also been associated with breast cancer and lung cancer risk, whereas variants in glutathione peroxidase 4, selenoprotein P and selenoprotein S may influence the risk of colorectal cancer. In addition, the results of gene microarray (transcriptomic) studies have identified novel selenoprotein biomarkers of Se status and novel downstream Se-targeted pathways. The work highlights the need to take baseline Se status and genetic factors into account in the design of future intervention trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Chemistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,447,845
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer treatment and research
#25
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,810
of 227,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer treatment and research
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.