↓ Skip to main content

Pressure-relieving interventions for treating diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pressure-relieving interventions for treating diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002302.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Lewis, Allyson Lipp

Abstract

Diabetes-related foot ulceration is a major contributor to morbidity in diabetes. Diabetic foot ulcers are partly a consequence of abnormal foot pressures and pressure relief is a widely used treatment for healing diabetes-related plantar foot ulcers, but the most effective method for healing is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 375 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 20%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Student > Postgraduate 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Other 82 22%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Engineering 10 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 93 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,376,812
of 18,026,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,440
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,307
of 160,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,026,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.