Egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 31,624)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
73 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
1052 tweeters
weibo
18 weibo users
facebook
162 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
15 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
6 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.e8539
Pubmed ID
Authors

Y. Rong, L. Chen, T. Zhu, Y. Song, M. Yu, Z. Shan, A. Sands, F. B. Hu, L. Liu, Ying Rong, Li Chen, Tingting Zhu, Yadong Song, Miao Yu, Zhilei Shan, Amanda Sands, Frank B Hu, Liegang Liu, Rong Y, Chen L, Zhu T, Song Y, Yu M, Shan Z, Sands A, Hu FB, Liu L

Abstract

To investigate and quantify the potential dose-response association between egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,052 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Australia 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 151 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 19%
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 26 15%
Other 25 15%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 42 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 18%
Sports and Recreations 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 22 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1602. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#419
of 7,430,852 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#19
of 31,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 113,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#2
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,430,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.