↓ Skip to main content

Egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
97 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
twitter
1597 X users
weibo
18 weibo users
facebook
191 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
18 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
33 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
510 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.e8539
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Rong, Li Chen, Tingting Zhu, Yadong Song, Miao Yu, Zhilei Shan, Amanda Sands, Frank B Hu, Liegang Liu

Abstract

To investigate and quantify the potential dose-response association between egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,597 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 493 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 94 18%
Researcher 69 14%
Student > Master 63 12%
Other 59 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 8%
Other 103 20%
Unknown 82 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 6%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Other 67 13%
Unknown 93 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,993
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#107
of 65,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 295,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.