↓ Skip to main content

A Brain-to-Brain Interface for Real-Time Sharing of Sensorimotor Information

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 51,990)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
662 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
A Brain-to-Brain Interface for Real-Time Sharing of Sensorimotor Information
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01319
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Pais-Vieira, Mikhail Lebedev, Carolina Kunicki, Jing Wang, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis, Pais-Vieira M, Lebedev M, Kunicki C, Wang J, Nicolelis MA

Abstract

A brain-to-brain interface (BTBI) enabled a real-time transfer of behaviorally meaningful sensorimotor information between the brains of two rats. In this BTBI, an "encoder" rat performed sensorimotor tasks that required it to select from two choices of tactile or visual stimuli. While the encoder rat performed the task, samples of its cortical activity were transmitted to matching cortical areas of a "decoder" rat using intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). The decoder rat learned to make similar behavioral selections, guided solely by the information provided by the encoder rat's brain. These results demonstrated that a complex system was formed by coupling the animals' brains, suggesting that BTBIs can enable dyads or networks of animal's brains to exchange, process, and store information and, hence, serve as the basis for studies of novel types of social interaction and for biological computing devices.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 911 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 27 4%
United Kingdom 12 2%
Germany 10 2%
Brazil 8 1%
Japan 6 <1%
France 6 <1%
Russian Federation 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Austria 4 <1%
Other 39 6%
Unknown 541 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 169 26%
Researcher 139 21%
Student > Master 97 15%
Student > Bachelor 93 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 5%
Other 128 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 33%
Psychology 79 12%
Neuroscience 76 11%
Engineering 69 10%
Computer Science 55 8%
Other 167 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,680
of 11,797,702 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#28
of 51,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 131,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,797,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.