↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Hordein (Gluten) in Beer – A Comparison of ELISA and Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring Hordein (Gluten) in Beer – A Comparison of ELISA and Mass Spectrometry
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056452
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory J. Tanner, Michelle L. Colgrave, Malcolm J. Blundell, Hareshwar P. Goswami, Crispin A. Howitt

Abstract

Subjects suffering from coeliac disease, gluten allergy/intolerance must adopt a lifelong avoidance of gluten. Beer contains trace levels of hordeins (gluten) which are too high to be safely consumed by most coeliacs. Accurate measurement of trace hordeins by ELISA is problematic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 42%
Chemistry 15 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Materials Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,269,280
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,419
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,958
of 205,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#896
of 5,382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.