↓ Skip to main content

At What Price? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Trial of Labour after Previous Caesarean versus Elective Repeat Caesarean Delivery

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
At What Price? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Trial of Labour after Previous Caesarean versus Elective Repeat Caesarean Delivery
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher G. Fawsitt, Jane Bourke, Richard A. Greene, Claire M. Everard, Aileen Murphy, Jennifer E. Lutomski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,646,954
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,499
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,671
of 194,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,302
of 5,401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.