The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
At What Price? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Trial of Labour after Previous Caesarean versus Elective Repeat Caesarean Delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0058577 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher G. Fawsitt, Jane Bourke, Richard A. Greene, Claire M. Everard, Aileen Murphy, Jennifer E. Lutomski |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 21% |
Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,308,932
of 26,779,733 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#118,053
of 233,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,567
of 210,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,855
of 5,405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,779,733 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.