The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Palatability of cat food with sodium pyrophosphate and yeast extract
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151651 |
Authors |
Rúbia Tabachi de Oliveira, Douglas Haese, João Luís Kill, Anderson Lima, Pablo Victor Malini, Guilherme Rodrigues Thompson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#166
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,142
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#3
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.