Title |
Cunnilingus Apparently Increases Duration of Copulation in the Indian Flying Fox, Pteropus giganteus
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0059743 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jayabalan Maruthupandian, Ganapathy Marimuthu |
Abstract |
We observed a total of 57 incidences of copulation in a colony of the Indian flying fox, Pteropus giganteus, over 13 months under natural conditions. The colony consisted of about 420 individuals, roosting in a Ficus religiosa tree. Copulations occurred between 07.00 h and 09.30 h from July to January, with more occurring in October and November. Initially males groomed their penis before approaching a nearby female. Females typically moved away and males followed. When the female stopped moving, the male started licking her vagina (cunnilingus). Typically each bout of cunnilingus lasted for about 50 s. In 57 out of 69 observations, the male mounted the female and copulated. The duration of copulation varied from 10 to 20 sec. After completion of copulation, the male continued cunnilingus for 94 to 188 sec. The duration of pre-copulatory cunnilingus and copulation was positively correlated whereas, the duration of pre- and post-copulatory cunnilingus was negatively correlated. Apart from humans, oral sex as foreplay prior to copulation is uncommon in mammals. Another pteropodid bat, Cynopterus sphinx exhibits fellatio with females licking the penis of males during copulation. It appears that bats, especially pteropodids perform oral sex, either cunnilingus or fellatio, possibly for achieving longer copulation. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
Japan | 4 | 4% |
France | 3 | 3% |
Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
Spain | 3 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 60 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 80 | 77% |
Scientists | 14 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 68 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 29% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |