↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the prevention of persistent post‐COVID‐19 olfactory dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for the prevention of persistent post‐COVID‐19 olfactory dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013877.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie E Webster, Lisa O'Byrne, Samuel MacKeith, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 55 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 61 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,591,341
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,920
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,617
of 438,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.