↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,653)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
111 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, September 2022
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2022-103738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby Ashken, James Bowness, Alan James Robert Macfarlane, Lloyd Turbitt, Boyne Bellew, Nigel Bedforth, David Burckett-St Laurent, Alain Delbos, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Nabil M Elkassabany, Jenny Ferry, Ben Fox, James L H French, Calum Grant, Ashwani Gupta, Rajnish K Gupta, Yavuz Gürkan, Nat Haslam, Helen Higham, Rosemary M G Hogg, David F Johnston, Rachel Joyce Kearns, Clara Lobo, Sonya McKinlay, Edward R Mariano, Stavros Memtsoudis, Peter Merjavy, Madan Narayanan, J Alison Noble, David Phillips, Meg Rosenblatt, Amy Sadler, Maria Paz Sebastian, Eric S Schwenk, Alasdair Taylor, Athmaja Thottungal, Luis Fernando Valdés-Vilches, Thomas Volk, Simeon West, Morné Wolmarans, Jonathan Womack, Amit Pawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 11 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#558,185
of 26,303,092 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#40
of 2,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,783
of 438,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,303,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.