The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Flowability Properties of Labisia Pumila Herbal Powder
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.018 |
Authors |
C.J. Etti, Y.A. Yusof, N.L. Chin, S. Mohd Tahir |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,020,671
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia
#11
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,649
of 312,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.