↓ Skip to main content

Using simulated Tianqin gravitational wave data and electromagnetic wave data to study the coincidence problem and Hubble tension problem* *Supported in part by the National Natural Science…

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Physics C, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using simulated Tianqin gravitational wave data and electromagnetic wave data to study the coincidence problem and Hubble tension problem* *Supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12105032, 12147102), Jia-Wei Zhang was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (12275036), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2021jcyjmsxmX0681, cstc2018jcyjAX0713, cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0553), the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJQN202001541), and the Research Foundation of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CK2016Z03). This study was also supported by the Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China (CYS21327). Authors Jia-Wei Zhang and Jing-Wang Diao contributed equally to this article. Authors Jia-Wei Zhang and Jing-Wang Diao are co-first authors of the article
Published in
Chinese Physics C, March 2023
DOI 10.1088/1674-1137/aca8f3
Authors

Jia-Wei Zhang, Jing-Wang Diao, Yu Pan, Ming-Yue Chen, Jin Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,724,817
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Physics C
#52
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,555
of 422,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Physics C
#2
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.