↓ Skip to main content

Smaller human populations are neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for biodiversity conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 6,741)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1671 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
10 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smaller human populations are neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for biodiversity conservation
Published in
Biological Conservation, January 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109841
Authors

Alice C. Hughes, Kévin Tougeron, Dominic A. Martin, Filippo Menga, Bruno H.P. Rosado, Sebastian Villasante, Shweta Madgulkar, Fernando Gonçalves, Davide Geneletti, Luisa Maria Diele-Viegas, Sebastian Berger, Sheila R. Colla, Vitor de Andrade Kamimura, Holly Caggiano, Felipe Melo, Marcelo Guilherme de Oliveira Dias, Elke Kellner, Edivando Vitor do Couto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,671 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 33%
Environmental Science 16 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 46 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 915. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#19,566
of 26,158,673 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#10
of 6,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#567
of 486,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,158,673 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.