The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,649 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Smaller human populations are neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for biodiversity conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109841 |
| Authors |
Alice C. Hughes, Kévin Tougeron, Dominic A. Martin, Filippo Menga, Bruno H.P. Rosado, Sebastian Villasante, Shweta Madgulkar, Fernando Gonçalves, Davide Geneletti, Luisa Maria Diele-Viegas, Sebastian Berger, Sheila R. Colla, Vitor de Andrade Kamimura, Holly Caggiano, Felipe Melo, Marcelo Guilherme de Oliveira Dias, Elke Kellner, Edivando Vitor do Couto |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 5% |
| Japan | 29 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 2% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| Australia | 9 | <1% |
| Brazil | 9 | <1% |
| France | 8 | <1% |
| Colombia | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 93 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1367 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1486 | 90% |
| Scientists | 109 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 917. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#19,813
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#11
of 6,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#583
of 493,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.