↓ Skip to main content

Protected areas support more species than unprotected areas in Great Britain, but lose them equally rapidly

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
318 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protected areas support more species than unprotected areas in Great Britain, but lose them equally rapidly
Published in
Biological Conservation, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109884
Authors

Rob Cooke, Francesca Mancini, Robin J. Boyd, Karl L. Evans, Anna Shaw, Thomas J. Webb, Nick J.B. Isaac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 318 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 27%
Environmental Science 19 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 28 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#94,194
of 26,277,952 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#54
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,442
of 487,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#3
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,277,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.