↓ Skip to main content

Protected areas support more species than unprotected areas in Great Britain, but lose them equally rapidly

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
317 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protected areas support more species than unprotected areas in Great Britain, but lose them equally rapidly
Published in
Biological Conservation, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109884
Authors

Rob Cooke, Francesca Mancini, Robin J. Boyd, Karl L. Evans, Anna Shaw, Thomas J. Webb, Nick J.B. Isaac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 317 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 27%
Environmental Science 19 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#92,818
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#52
of 6,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,390
of 479,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#3
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.