↓ Skip to main content

Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010590.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund Ym Chung, Suetonia C Palmer, Valeria M Saglimbene, Jonathan C Craig, Marcello Tonelli, Giovanni Fm Strippoli

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Unspecified 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 5 5%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 60 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Unspecified 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 61 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,002,366
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,600
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,523
of 506,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.