↓ Skip to main content

A field test of attractant traps for invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) in southern Florida

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A field test of attractant traps for invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) in southern Florida
Published in
Wildlife Research, April 2011
DOI 10.1071/wr10202
Authors

Robert N. Reed, Kristen M. Hart, Gordon H. Rodda, Frank J. Mazzotti, Ray W. Snow, Michael Cherkiss, Ronald Rozar, Scott Goetz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 29%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 47%
Environmental Science 16 26%
Unspecified 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#1,056
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,833
of 120,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.