↓ Skip to main content

A field test of attractant traps for invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) in southern Florida

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A field test of attractant traps for invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) in southern Florida
Published in
Wildlife Research, January 2011
DOI 10.1071/wr10202
Authors

Robert N. Reed, Kristen M. Hart, Gordon H. Rodda, Frank J. Mazzotti, Ray W. Snow, Michael Cherkiss, Ronald Rozar, Scott Goetz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 54%
Environmental Science 13 27%
Mathematics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,638,579
of 15,147,858 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#720
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,060
of 385,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#39
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,147,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.