↓ Skip to main content

Site-specific effects on productivity of an upper trophic-level marine predator: Bottom-up, top-down, and mismatch effects on reproduction in a colonial seabird

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Oceanography, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Site-specific effects on productivity of an upper trophic-level marine predator: Bottom-up, top-down, and mismatch effects on reproduction in a colonial seabird
Published in
Progress in Oceanography, February 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.02.006
Authors

Robert M. Suryan, David B. Irons, Evelyn D. Brown, Patrick G.R. Jodice, Daniel D. Roby

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 117 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 63%
Environmental Science 19 14%
Engineering 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#9,008,830
of 26,601,477 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Oceanography
#640
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,718
of 174,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Oceanography
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,601,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.