↓ Skip to main content

Hemodynamic Implications of Prone Positioning in Patients with ARDS

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
95 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemodynamic Implications of Prone Positioning in Patients with ARDS
Published in
Critical Care, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13054-023-04369-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Lai, Xavier Monnet, Jean-Louis Teboul

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#705,782
of 26,238,951 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#462
of 6,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,672
of 432,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#19
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.