↓ Skip to main content

Uracil in the carbonaceous asteroid (162173) Ryugu

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
226 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
626 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uracil in the carbonaceous asteroid (162173) Ryugu
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-36904-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuhiro Oba, Toshiki Koga, Yoshinori Takano, Nanako O. Ogawa, Naohiko Ohkouchi, Kazunori Sasaki, Hajime Sato, Daniel P. Glavin, Jason P. Dworkin, Hiroshi Naraoka, Shogo Tachibana, Hisayoshi Yurimoto, Tomoki Nakamura, Takaaki Noguchi, Ryuji Okazaki, Hikaru Yabuta, Kanako Sakamoto, Toru Yada, Masahiro Nishimura, Aiko Nakato, Akiko Miyazaki, Kasumi Yogata, Masanao Abe, Tatsuaki Okada, Tomohiro Usui, Makoto Yoshikawa, Takanao Saiki, Satoshi Tanaka, Fuyuto Terui, Satoru Nakazawa, Sei-ichiro Watanabe, Yuichi Tsuda

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 626 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 19%
Chemistry 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Physics and Astronomy 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2024.
All research outputs
#4,088
of 26,811,236 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#75
of 63,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106
of 433,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#5
of 1,960 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,811,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,960 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.