↓ Skip to main content

Experts’ opinions on threats to Leach’s Storm-Petrels ( Hydrobates leucorhous ) across their global range

Overview of attention for article published in Avian Conservation & Ecology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 272)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experts’ opinions on threats to Leach’s Storm-Petrels ( Hydrobates leucorhous ) across their global range
Published in
Avian Conservation & Ecology, January 2023
DOI 10.5751/ace-02370-180111
Authors

Ingrid L. Pollet, Ariel K. Lenske, Anne N. M. A. Ausems, Christophe Barbraud, Yuliana Bedolla-Guzmán, Anthony W. J. Bicknell, Mark Bolton, Alexander L. Bond, Karine Delord, Antony W. Diamond, David A. Fifield, Carina Gjerdrum, Luke R. Halpin, Erpur S. Hansen, April Hedd, Rielle Hoeg, Heather L. Major, Robert A. Mauck, Gregory T. W. McClelland, Laura McFarlane Tranquilla, William A. Montevecchi, Mike Parker, Isabeau Pratte, Jean-François Rail, Gregory J. Robertson, Jennifer C. Rock, Robert A. Ronconi, Dave Shutler, Iain J. Stenhouse, Akinori Takahashi, Yukata Watanuki, Linda J. Welch, Sabina I. Wilhelm, Sarah N. P. Wong, Mark L. Mallory

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Environmental Science 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,940,548
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Avian Conservation & Ecology
#12
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,634
of 487,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Avian Conservation & Ecology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.