↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,439)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), May 2013
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Authors

John Cook, Dana Nuccitelli, Sarah A Green, Mark Richardson, Bärbel Winkler, Rob Painting, Robert Way, Peter Jacobs, Andrew Skuce

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,862 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 3%
Student > Bachelor 13 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 <1%
Unspecified 4 <1%
Student > Postgraduate 2 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 380 90%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 2%
Environmental Science 5 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 <1%
Unspecified 4 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 <1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 380 90%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3415. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#123
of 11,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 2,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 135,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.