↓ Skip to main content

Toward a national eDNA strategy for the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental DNA, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 499)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a national eDNA strategy for the United States
Published in
Environmental DNA, May 2023
DOI 10.1002/edn3.432
Authors

Ryan P. Kelly, David M. Lodge, Kai N. Lee, Susanna Theroux, Adam J. Sepulveda, Christopher A. Scholin, Joseph M. Craine, Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz Allan, Krista M. Nichols, Kim M. Parsons, Kelly D. Goodwin, Zachary Gold, Francisco P. Chavez, Rachel T. Noble, Cathryn L. Abbott, Melinda R. Baerwald, Amanda M. Naaum, Peter M. Thielen, Ariel Levi Simons, Christopher L. Jerde, Jeffrey J. Duda, Margaret E. Hunter, John A. Hagan, Rachel Sarah Meyer, Joshua A. Steele, Mark Y. Stoeckle, Holly M. Bik, Christopher P. Meyer, Eric Stein, Karen E. James, Austen C. Thomas, Elif Demir‐Hilton, Molly A. Timmers, John F. Griffith, Michael J. Weise, Stephen B. Weisberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 21%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#539,839
of 26,320,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental DNA
#13
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,638
of 399,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental DNA
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,320,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.